Triple
T29983592
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | SSR Georgia |
E761662
|
entity |
| Predicate | constitutionalStatusChange |
P96090
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 1936 Soviet Constitution |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 1936 Soviet Constitution | Statement: [SSR Georgia, constitutionalStatusChange, 1936 Soviet Constitution]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: constitutionalStatusChange Context triple: [SSR Georgia, constitutionalStatusChange, 1936 Soviet Constitution]
-
A.
constitutionStatus
Indicates the legal or formal status of an entity as defined or recognized by a constitution.
-
B.
constitutionalChange
Indicates a formal modification, addition, or removal of provisions within a constitution or foundational legal framework.
-
C.
constitutionalChangeFrom
chosen
Indicates a relationship where one constitutional state, framework, or arrangement is transformed or replaced by another, marking the source state from which the change originates.
-
D.
constitutionalNameChangedFrom
Indicates that an entity’s official constitutional name was previously a specified name and has since been changed from that earlier form.
-
E.
constitutionalAmendmentStatus
Indicates the legal status or stage of progress of a proposed or existing constitutional amendment within a constitutional process.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f2246851148190b8e76206db94b105 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:31 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f757898fe48190b124dc7301672623 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:11 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f754c484348190948d2a04ff228fb1 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 1:59 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 6:35 p.m.