Triple

T29971759
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Gemini 9 E761335 entity
Predicate rendezvousOutcome P51259 FINISHED
Object successful rendezvous with ATDA without docking LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: successful rendezvous with ATDA without docking | Statement: [Gemini 9, rendezvousOutcome, successful rendezvous with ATDA without docking]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: rendezvousOutcome
Context triple: [Gemini 9, rendezvousOutcome, successful rendezvous with ATDA without docking]
  • A. rendezvousWith
    Indicates that two or more entities meet or come together at an agreed place and time, often for a specific purpose.
  • B. rendezvousTarget
    Indicates that one entity is designated as the meeting or rendezvous point for another entity.
  • C. rendezvousSystem
    Indicates a system or mechanism that coordinates and manages the meeting or docking of two or more entities at a specified place and time.
  • D. rendezvousType
    Indicates the specific kind or category of meeting or rendezvous that occurs between entities.
  • E. rendezvousAttemptResult chosen
    Indicates the outcome or status of an attempt by entities to meet or rendezvous with each other.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f22467626081908d5afea489590e96 completed April 29, 2026, 3:31 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6786ee1608190ad7cf42111f2b7df completed May 2, 2026, 10:19 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f673c4abec8190bc2379e66f4af0a9 completed May 2, 2026, 9:59 p.m.
Created at: April 29, 2026, 6:32 p.m.