Triple

T29964518
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Safari (Remix) E761140 entity
Predicate hasUpdatedArrangement P168718 FINISHED
Object true LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Safari (Remix), hasUpdatedArrangement, true]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasUpdatedArrangement
Context triple: [Safari (Remix), hasUpdatedArrangement, true]
  • A. hasArrangement
    Indicates that one entity possesses, follows, or is organized according to a particular configuration, setup, or ordering defined by another entity.
  • B. hasLiveArrangement
    Indicates that there is an active, ongoing arrangement or agreement currently in effect between the related entities.
  • C. hasArrangementBy
    Indicates that something (such as a work or piece) is in an arranged form created by a particular arranger.
  • D. hasArrangementFor
    Indicates that one entity has an established plan, setup, or provision in place to accommodate, support, or serve another entity or purpose.
  • E. isArrangementOf
    Indicates that one entity is a specific ordering or configuration of the components or elements of another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f22466327481908ba6db916837bece completed April 29, 2026, 3:31 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f67867c7d481908de3db59b2bd7768 completed May 2, 2026, 10:19 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f673c4abec8190bc2379e66f4af0a9 completed May 2, 2026, 9:59 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f674df80b08190adb7f7531083bbb1 completed May 2, 2026, 10:04 p.m.
Created at: April 29, 2026, 6:29 p.m.