Triple
T29951761
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Laurin & Klement FC |
E760784
|
entity |
| Predicate | usedTechnologyLevel |
P2086
|
FINISHED |
| Object | early 20th-century automotive technology |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: early 20th-century automotive technology | Statement: [Laurin & Klement FC, usedTechnologyLevel, early 20th-century automotive technology]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usedTechnologyLevel Context triple: [Laurin & Klement FC, usedTechnologyLevel, early 20th-century automotive technology]
-
A.
technologyLevel
chosen
Indicates the degree of technological advancement or sophistication associated with an entity relative to others or to a defined scale.
-
B.
technologyLevelComparedTo
Indicates how the technological advancement of one entity compares relative to that of another entity.
-
C.
technologyEnabled
Indicates that one entity provides or supports the technological means that allow another entity, process, or capability to function or be carried out.
-
D.
technologyUse
Indicates the use or application of a particular technology by an entity to perform an action or achieve a purpose.
-
E.
laterUsedTechnology
Indicates that one entity adopted or employed a technology after another entity had already used it.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f2246562b881909d57622f4086d43d |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:31 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6c1265c208190aacd2b551f8f0f82 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:29 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6bd2415fc81908c23c311aebce66f |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:12 a.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 6:26 p.m.