Triple
T29950876
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Cambridge capital controversies |
E760764
|
entity |
| Predicate | challengesAssumptionOf |
P123751
|
FINISHED |
| Object | neoclassical economics |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: neoclassical economics | Statement: [Cambridge capital controversies, challengesAssumptionOf, neoclassical economics]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: challengesAssumptionOf Context triple: [Cambridge capital controversies, challengesAssumptionOf, neoclassical economics]
-
A.
assumptionTested
Indicates that an assumption or hypothesis has been subjected to a test or evaluation to verify its validity.
-
B.
rejectsAssumption
Indicates that one entity explicitly refuses to accept or denies the validity of a proposed assumption made by another entity.
-
C.
overturnedAssumption
chosen
Indicates that a previously held assumption has been challenged and shown to be invalid or no longer acceptable.
-
D.
challengesHypothesis
Indicates that one entity questions, disputes, or seeks to refute the validity or correctness of another entity’s hypothesis.
-
E.
assumes
Indicates that one entity takes on, accepts, or presumes a role, responsibility, state, or fact regarding another entity or situation.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f2246562b881909d57622f4086d43d |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:31 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6783586948190bbb1d9f27fba961a |
completed | May 2, 2026, 10:18 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f66ec8298c8190b41fe9d182c05676 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 9:38 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 6:25 p.m.