Triple

T29920641
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Jorge Luke as Ke-Ni-Tay E759918 entity
Predicate hasAllegianceInFiction P174893 FINISHED
Object U.S. Army NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: U.S. Army | Statement: [Jorge Luke as Ke-Ni-Tay, hasAllegianceInFiction, U.S. Army]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasAllegianceInFiction
Context triple: [Jorge Luke as Ke-Ni-Tay, hasAllegianceInFiction, U.S. Army]
  • A. hasAuthorAllegiance
    Indicates that an author is affiliated with, loyal to, or aligned with a particular group, organization, cause, or ideology.
  • B. namedForAllegiance
    Indicates that an entity is named in reference to, or in honor of, a particular allegiance, affiliation, or loyalty.
  • C. hadAllegiance
    Indicates that an entity was loyally committed or formally bound in support or service to another entity, such as a person, group, or cause.
  • D. alliesInFiction
    Indicates that two or more entities are portrayed as allies or cooperative partners within a fictional context or narrative.
  • E. isFictionalAgentOf chosen
    Indicates that one entity is a fictional character or agent that acts on behalf of, or represents, another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f2246189fc8190996b63ee1f9a2374 completed April 29, 2026, 3:31 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f7764ab1fc81909f9348db87bd7692 completed May 3, 2026, 4:22 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f76905d9c88190b1ee810bc9ab644f completed May 3, 2026, 3:25 p.m.
Created at: April 29, 2026, 6:14 p.m.