Triple
T29911980
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | AVAudioPlayer |
E759691
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasDelegateProtocol |
P138318
|
FINISHED |
| Object | AVAudioPlayerDelegate |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: AVAudioPlayerDelegate | Statement: [AVAudioPlayer, hasDelegateProtocol, AVAudioPlayerDelegate]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasDelegateProtocol Context triple: [AVAudioPlayer, hasDelegateProtocol, AVAudioPlayerDelegate]
-
A.
hasDelegate
chosen
Indicates that one entity has another entity assigned or authorized to act on its behalf as a delegate.
-
B.
hasDelegations
Indicates that an entity has assigned or transferred certain responsibilities, authority, or tasks to one or more other entities.
-
C.
hasProtocol
Indicates that an entity uses, follows, or is governed by a specified protocol or set of procedural rules.
-
D.
mayBeDelegatedTo
Indicates that a responsibility, task, or authority can be transferred from one entity to another to act on its behalf.
-
E.
canDelegateTo
Indicates that one entity has the authority or ability to transfer or assign its responsibilities, tasks, or decision-making power to another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224600590819085e148a01c056ef6 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:31 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fd7b0503a08190ba07338365b6fcc9 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 5:56 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fd7a9733dc81909199f453c0cc2bc1 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 5:54 a.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 6:10 p.m.