Triple
T29884586
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Banbasa–Mahendranagar crossing |
E758973
|
entity |
| Predicate | administrativelyUnderOnNepaliSide |
P149548
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Government of Sudurpashchim Province |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Government of Sudurpashchim Province | Statement: [Banbasa–Mahendranagar crossing, administrativelyUnderOnNepaliSide, Government of Sudurpashchim Province]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: administrativelyUnderOnNepaliSide Context triple: [Banbasa–Mahendranagar crossing, administrativelyUnderOnNepaliSide, Government of Sudurpashchim Province]
-
A.
isUnderAdministrationOf
chosen
Indicates that one entity is managed, governed, or overseen by another authority or administrative body.
-
B.
bordersAdministrativeRegionOfNepal
Indicates that one administrative region of Nepal shares a common boundary with another administrative region of Nepal.
-
C.
entryPointFromNepal
Indicates that something serves as an entry point or access route originating from Nepal.
-
D.
borderTypeWithNepal
Indicates the specific nature or classification of the border relationship that an entity shares with Nepal.
-
E.
negotiatedUnderAdministrationOf
Indicates that an agreement or negotiation took place while a particular administration or governing authority was in power and overseeing the process.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f2245de2f48190a481404896b56254 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:31 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fba2877b248190a974eb092243c0c4 |
completed | May 6, 2026, 8:20 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fb8d06a1b48190a937aa410d159dfa |
completed | May 6, 2026, 6:48 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 5:59 p.m.