Triple

T29879687
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Battle of Angamos E758841 entity
Predicate combatantCommanderForChile P85188 FINISHED
Object Galvarino Riveros Cárdenas NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Galvarino Riveros Cárdenas | Statement: [Battle of Angamos, combatantCommanderForChile, Galvarino Riveros Cárdenas]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: combatantCommanderForChile
Context triple: [Battle of Angamos, combatantCommanderForChile, Galvarino Riveros Cárdenas]
  • A. commanderForChile chosen
    Indicates that an individual serves or has served as a military or organizational commander on behalf of Chile.
  • B. commanderArgentina
    Indicates that one entity serves as the military or organizational commander of Argentina.
  • C. commanderForPeru
    Indicates that an entity serves or has served as a military commander on behalf of Peru.
  • D. commandingOfficerAtBattleOfIquique
    Indicates that one entity served as the commanding officer of the other entity during the Battle of Iquique.
  • E. militaryCommanderMexican
    Indicates that one entity serves as the military commander of the other entity, specifically within a Mexican military context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f2245de2f48190a481404896b56254 completed April 29, 2026, 3:31 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f68a16debc8190a12f5f65ced055d7 completed May 2, 2026, 11:34 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6860def1c81909d79e1f088c4b5e5 completed May 2, 2026, 11:17 p.m.
Created at: April 29, 2026, 5:57 p.m.