Triple

T29863803
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject mod_lua E758393 entity
Predicate targetSoftware P79628 FINISHED
Object Apache HTTP Server 2.4 NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Apache HTTP Server 2.4 | Statement: [mod_lua, targetSoftware, Apache HTTP Server 2.4]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: targetSoftware
Context triple: [mod_lua, targetSoftware, Apache HTTP Server 2.4]
  • A. targetedSoftware chosen
    Indicates that a particular piece of software is the specific focus or target of an action, operation, or effect.
  • B. softwareFor
    Indicates that one entity is designed, intended, or used to operate on, support, or be compatible with another entity as software.
  • C. hasSoftwareCompatibilityWith
    Indicates that one software system can operate correctly and effectively with another software system, without conflicts or required modifications.
  • D. softwareFormat
    Indicates that one entity specifies or uses the file or data format in which a software-related item is encoded, stored, or delivered.
  • E. usesSoftware
    Indicates that one entity employs or operates a particular software application or system to perform tasks or functions.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f2245b4dec8190b85f664d918a00a5 completed April 29, 2026, 3:31 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fd231cab588190ad0953dc8f4af8f2 completed May 7, 2026, 11:41 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fd1aa3f1c481909fe6e9cab1383551 completed May 7, 2026, 11:05 p.m.
Created at: April 29, 2026, 5:50 p.m.