Triple
T29844473
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Gadaa system |
E757892
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | indigenous socio-political institution |
C53345
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: indigenous socio-political institution Context triple: [Gadaa system, instanceOf, indigenous socio-political institution]
-
A.
Indigenous self-government
Indigenous self-government is the inherent right and practical authority of Indigenous peoples to govern their own affairs, lands, and communities according to their laws, traditions, and institutions, within or alongside existing state structures.
-
B.
local chieftaincy institution
chosen
A local chieftaincy institution is a traditional governance structure led by a recognized chief or council of chiefs that exercises cultural, social, and sometimes political authority within a specific community or territory.
-
C.
Indigenous representative body proposal
A structured plan or framework outlining the creation, role, and operation of a formal body that represents Indigenous peoples in political, legal, or policy decision-making processes.
-
D.
indigenous political office
An indigenous political office is a formal position of authority and responsibility within an Indigenous community or governance system, grounded in that community’s own cultural, legal, and political traditions.
-
E.
agrarian political organization
An agrarian political organization is a group that advocates for the interests, rights, and policy priorities of rural communities and agricultural producers within a political system.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224593f6c81908785a560fe659f58 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:31 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 5:41 p.m.