Triple
T29844273
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Tiraspol Airport |
E757886
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasInfrastructureCondition |
P197820
|
FINISHED |
| Object | partly deteriorated |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: partly deteriorated | Statement: [Tiraspol Airport, hasInfrastructureCondition, partly deteriorated]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasInfrastructureCondition Context triple: [Tiraspol Airport, hasInfrastructureCondition, partly deteriorated]
-
A.
hasInfrastructureAbove
Indicates that one entity’s infrastructure is physically located above or over another entity.
-
B.
hasInfrastructureType
Indicates that an entity possesses or is associated with a specific category or type of infrastructure.
-
C.
hasAccessInfrastructure
Indicates that an entity is equipped with or connected to the physical or technical infrastructure necessary to access a particular service, resource, or network.
-
D.
hasInfrastructurePolicy
Indicates that an entity has established rules, plans, or guidelines governing the development, management, or use of infrastructure.
-
E.
hasInfrastructurePeriod
Indicates the time period during which a particular piece of infrastructure exists, is in use, or is valid.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224593f6c81908785a560fe659f58 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:31 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69feafa1ba0081909013800b85a9f613 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 3:53 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69feae58d62c81909d031f3df8992883 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 3:47 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69feafa0acd881908bb6c01635b5537a |
completed | May 9, 2026, 3:53 a.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 5:41 p.m.