Triple
T29843347
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ram Chrysomallos |
E757859
|
entity |
| Predicate | fleeceLocatedIn |
P40
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Colchis |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Colchis | Statement: [Ram Chrysomallos, fleeceLocatedIn, Colchis]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: fleeceLocatedIn Context triple: [Ram Chrysomallos, fleeceLocatedIn, Colchis]
-
A.
sometimesLocatedIn
Indicates that an entity is located in a given place only at certain times or under certain conditions, rather than permanently or always.
-
B.
locatedIn
chosen
Indicates that one entity exists or is situated within the spatial, administrative, or conceptual boundaries of another entity.
-
C.
locatedUnder
Indicates that one entity is positioned directly or generally beneath another entity in space.
-
D.
likelyLocatedIn
Indicates that an entity is probably situated within or associated with a particular location, though not with absolute certainty.
-
E.
locatedOver
Indicates that one entity is positioned above another entity, typically without direct contact, in a vertical or overhead spatial relationship.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224593f6c81908785a560fe659f58 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:31 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f676f968d08190a4adba0439b438c9 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 10:13 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f675ff62c48190a634bbb8896973b9 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 10:09 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 5:40 p.m.