Triple

T29835599
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Rurikid principalities E757648 entity
Predicate legacyFor P122614 FINISHED
Object Russian statehood LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Russian statehood | Statement: [Rurikid principalities, legacyFor, Russian statehood]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legacyFor
Context triple: [Rurikid principalities, legacyFor, Russian statehood]
  • A. heritageFor chosen
    Indicates that something serves as a source, basis, or contributing legacy for another entity’s heritage or tradition.
  • B. usesLegacyOf
    Indicates that one entity makes use of, builds upon, or derives benefit from the historical work, reputation, or established influence of another entity.
  • C. managedLegacyOf
    Indicates that one entity was responsible for overseeing, preserving, or directing the continuation and impact of another entity’s legacy.
  • D. legacyPlan
    Indicates that an entity is associated with or governed by an older, previously existing plan rather than a current or updated one.
  • E. heritageSuccessor
    Indicates that one entity is the successor or inheritor of another in terms of heritage, lineage, or cultural tradition.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f224593f6c81908785a560fe659f58 completed April 29, 2026, 3:31 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f67605e9548190855ca2d77608b4dc completed May 2, 2026, 10:09 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f66ac32b60819092290b2de35988d3 completed May 2, 2026, 9:21 p.m.
Created at: April 29, 2026, 5:36 p.m.