Triple
T29833522
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Grampound |
E757590
|
entity |
| Predicate | electoralReputation |
P194556
|
FINISHED |
| Object | rotten borough |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: rotten borough | Statement: [Grampound, electoralReputation, rotten borough]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: electoralReputation Context triple: [Grampound, electoralReputation, rotten borough]
-
A.
electoralDignity
Indicates a relationship where an entity holds or is associated with an official electoral office, rank, or honor within a political or voting system.
-
B.
electoralSignificance
Indicates the importance or impact that something has on an election’s outcome, dynamics, or results.
-
C.
electoralSuccess
Indicates that an entity has achieved a favorable or winning outcome in an election or electoral process.
-
D.
electoralRank
Indicates the position or level an entity holds within an electoral hierarchy or ranking system.
-
E.
electoralFront
Indicates a political alliance or coalition formed by multiple parties or groups to contest elections together as a unified front.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f22457c84c8190a6d9f56bc74082a9 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:31 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fd7b0503a08190ba07338365b6fcc9 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 5:56 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fd7a9733dc81909199f453c0cc2bc1 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 5:54 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69fd7b042a548190b3abe31bc3258278 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 5:56 a.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 5:35 p.m.