Triple
T29826578
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | 2012 Myanmar by-elections |
E757395
|
entity |
| Predicate | impactOnSanctions |
P178318
|
FINISHED |
| Object | contributed to easing of Western sanctions |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: contributed to easing of Western sanctions | Statement: [2012 Myanmar by-elections, impactOnSanctions, contributed to easing of Western sanctions]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: impactOnSanctions Context triple: [2012 Myanmar by-elections, impactOnSanctions, contributed to easing of Western sanctions]
-
A.
impactOnTrade
Indicates a relationship where one entity causes or contributes to a change in the trade activities, volume, or conditions affecting another entity.
-
B.
imposesSanctionsOn
Indicates that one entity enforces punitive or restrictive measures against another entity, typically to influence or penalize its behavior.
-
C.
appliedSanctionsTo
Indicates that one entity has imposed sanctions or punitive restrictions on another entity.
-
D.
canImposeSanctions
Indicates that one entity has the authority or power to apply punitive or restrictive measures (sanctions) against another entity.
-
E.
impactOnIran
Indicates the effect or consequences that an action, event, or policy has on Iran.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f22457c84c8190a6d9f56bc74082a9 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:31 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f70e8755a48190931eaa77946f9460 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 8:59 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f70abc00848190a1c3f495ef6c8dc6 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 8:43 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f70e854b9c8190a3416e2189e17742 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 8:59 a.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 5:32 p.m.