Triple

T29823273
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Sally Hurst E757307 entity
Predicate threatLocation P173266 FINISHED
Object inside the house LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: inside the house | Statement: [Sally Hurst, threatLocation, inside the house]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: threatLocation
Context triple: [Sally Hurst, threatLocation, inside the house]
  • A. threatEncounteredNear
    Indicates that a threat was encountered in close spatial proximity to a specified reference point or entity.
  • B. threatType
    Indicates the specific category or nature of a threat that one entity poses or represents in relation to another.
  • C. threatCategory
    Indicates the classification of a threat according to its type, severity, or nature within a defined risk or security framework.
  • D. threatContained
    Indicates that an identified threat has been successfully neutralized, controlled, or otherwise prevented from causing further harm or escalation.
  • E. threatTypeAddressed
    Indicates that a given action, measure, or entity is specifically intended to counter or mitigate a particular type of threat.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f2245701c88190ad42415a0956c4ed completed April 29, 2026, 3:31 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6b342499c8190b85009a3f0f179e4 completed May 3, 2026, 2:30 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6b14d7d508190bc7d4c89dfba4a32 completed May 3, 2026, 2:22 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f6b2a31e008190aacef03c2ebe5787 completed May 3, 2026, 2:27 a.m.
Created at: April 29, 2026, 5:30 p.m.