Triple
T29812303
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Transistor |
E756998
|
entity |
| Predicate | successorByDeveloper |
P67353
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Pyre |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Pyre | Statement: [Transistor, successorByDeveloper, Pyre]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: successorByDeveloper Context triple: [Transistor, successorByDeveloper, Pyre]
-
A.
successorManufacturer
Indicates that one manufacturer has taken over, replaced, or continued the role or operations of another manufacturer as its successor.
-
B.
wasLaterDevelopedBy
chosen
Indicates that something (such as an idea, product, or work) was created or further developed at a later time by a specified agent or entity.
-
C.
successorSoftware
Indicates that one software product directly follows and replaces another as its newer version or update.
-
D.
chronologicallySucceededBy
Indicates that one event or state occurs later in time than, and thus follows, another.
-
E.
introducedAsSuccessorOf
Indicates that one entity was formally presented or designated to take over the role, position, or function previously held by another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f2245584848190ad4cab1f07752ccb |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:31 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fe5c1a502081909d4024e514309c8e |
completed | May 8, 2026, 9:56 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fe5a9df21c819087153f5d0bcaa987 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 9:50 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 5:24 p.m.