Triple

T29810472
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject coat of arms of Hillegom E756946 entity
Predicate hasHeraldicChargeColor P95589 FINISHED
Object red LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: red | Statement: [coat of arms of Hillegom, hasHeraldicChargeColor, red]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasHeraldicChargeColor
Context triple: [coat of arms of Hillegom, hasHeraldicChargeColor, red]
  • A. heraldicColor chosen
    Indicates that one entity specifies or bears a particular heraldic color in a coat of arms or related heraldic context.
  • B. heraldicCharge
    Indicates that one entity serves as a heraldic charge, i.e., a symbolic figure or emblem placed on another entity’s coat of arms or shield.
  • C. hasHeraldicOrdinary
    Indicates that an entity bears or includes a specific heraldic ordinary (a basic geometric figure) as part of its coat of arms or heraldic design.
  • D. hasHeraldicMeaning
    Indicates that something (typically a symbol, color, or design) carries a specific meaning or significance within the system of heraldry.
  • E. hasHeraldicUse
    Indicates that something is used as, or incorporated into, a heraldic device, emblem, or coat of arms.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f2245584848190ad4cab1f07752ccb completed April 29, 2026, 3:31 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f78fd5a6388190bfda4bbb2e222e5b completed May 3, 2026, 6:11 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f78e2ac3fc819081a45c6841375c8d completed May 3, 2026, 6:04 p.m.
Created at: April 29, 2026, 5:23 p.m.