Triple

T2981006
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Pe E80509 entity
Predicate hasAllograph P39012 FINISHED
Object Pe with dagesh LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Pe with dagesh | Statement: [Pe, hasAllograph, Pe with dagesh]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasAllograph
Context triple: [Pe, hasAllograph, Pe with dagesh]
  • A. hasDistinctLetterForms chosen
    Indicates that the related writing system or symbol set uses different visual shapes or styles for the same letter in different contexts (such as position, case, or usage).
  • B. hasCyrillicAlphabetForm
    Indicates that an entity has a corresponding representation or form written in the Cyrillic alphabet.
  • C. hasAlternativeVocalization
    Indicates that an entity has another valid way it can be vocalized or pronounced, distinct from its primary or standard vocalization.
  • D. usesAlphabet
    Indicates that one entity employs or is written using the alphabet or writing system associated with another entity.
  • E. usesAdditionalLettersFrom
    Indicates that one entity forms or derives its representation by incorporating extra letters taken from another entity beyond those originally present.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ad8b15f6ac8190be5fd16a33edcb4f completed March 8, 2026, 2:43 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ad99a098e08190976eb4b019818f67 completed March 8, 2026, 3:45 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ad9611fc348190a5d17d237f653f60 completed March 8, 2026, 3:30 p.m.
Created at: March 8, 2026, 2:58 p.m.