Triple
T29788183
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | I Am a Camera (The Buggles version) |
E756322
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasReimaginedFrom |
P165520
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Into the Lens |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Into the Lens | Statement: [I Am a Camera (The Buggles version), hasReimaginedFrom, Into the Lens]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasReimaginedFrom Context triple: [I Am a Camera (The Buggles version), hasReimaginedFrom, Into the Lens]
-
A.
containsReimaginedVersionsOf
Indicates that one entity includes or incorporates updated, reinterpreted, or newly imagined versions of another entity.
-
B.
partOfReimaginingOf
Indicates that something is a component or segment within a larger work that is itself a reimagined version of an earlier work.
-
C.
isModernReimaginingOf
chosen
Indicates that one work is a contemporary reinterpretation or updated version of another earlier work.
-
D.
remadeFor
Indicates that one work has been recreated or adapted specifically for another context, audience, or medium.
-
E.
hasRemake
Indicates that one work is a new version or recreation of an earlier existing work.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f22451fb748190bbdbab401280affb |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:31 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a00262d71488190a769783fb09e5803 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 6:31 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a0023985f148190a335a3fb93e9981e |
completed | May 10, 2026, 6:20 a.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 5:10 p.m.