Triple
T29786764
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Asante |
E756284
|
entity |
| Predicate | traditionalLegalInstitution |
P112740
|
FINISHED |
| Object | chiefs’ courts |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: chiefs’ courts | Statement: [Asante, traditionalLegalInstitution, chiefs’ courts]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: traditionalLegalInstitution Context triple: [Asante, traditionalLegalInstitution, chiefs’ courts]
-
A.
traditionalLawGivingSite
Indicates a location that is traditionally recognized as the place where laws or legal codes were formally given or proclaimed.
-
B.
legalTraditionsTaught
Indicates that one entity teaches, covers, or includes specific legal traditions in its instruction or curriculum.
-
C.
legalDoctrine
Indicates that one legal principle, rule, or theory is being applied, referenced, or relied upon as an authoritative basis for interpreting or deciding a legal issue.
-
D.
coexistingLegalTradition
Indicates that multiple legal traditions or systems exist and operate simultaneously within the same social or institutional context.
-
E.
traditionalCourt
chosen
Indicates that an entity is associated with or takes place in a conventional or historically established court of law, as opposed to a modern, alternative, or informal judicial setting.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f22451fb748190bbdbab401280affb |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:31 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fd82ed2a4c81908bd7797fbd2e3d08 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 6:30 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fd814cc10481908e4f8123d35a5d0c |
completed | May 8, 2026, 6:23 a.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 5:09 p.m.