Triple
T29779909
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Me, Myself & I |
E755482
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasCollaborativeNature |
P126368
|
FINISHED |
| Object | features guest artists |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: features guest artists | Statement: [Me, Myself & I, hasCollaborativeNature, features guest artists]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasCollaborativeNature Context triple: [Me, Myself & I, hasCollaborativeNature, features guest artists]
-
A.
isCollaborative
Indicates that two or more entities work together jointly toward a shared goal or outcome.
-
B.
isCollaboration
Indicates that two or more entities are jointly working together toward a shared goal or producing something in partnership.
-
C.
usesCollaboration
Indicates that one entity employs or relies on collaborative methods, tools, or partnerships with another entity to achieve a shared goal or perform an activity.
-
D.
containsCollaboration
chosen
Indicates that one entity includes or involves a collaborative relationship or joint activity with another entity.
-
E.
isCollaborativelyWritten
Indicates that multiple entities jointly contribute to the writing or creation of the same work.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f0ef878574819088c867fd1a5c8b86 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 5:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a00a2f0d1588190a936ea7df0ef0464 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 3:23 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a00a28ccd94819085b5e123f5a4769e |
completed | May 10, 2026, 3:21 p.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 8:49 p.m.