Triple

T29778496
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Going for Gold E755445 entity
Predicate languageOfContestants P198138 FINISHED
Object English as common language LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: English as common language | Statement: [Going for Gold, languageOfContestants, English as common language]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: languageOfContestants
Context triple: [Going for Gold, languageOfContestants, English as common language]
  • A. languageOfCompetition
    Indicates the language in which a competition is conducted or officially presented.
  • B. languageOfGame
    Indicates that a particular language is used as the primary or official language for a given game.
  • C. languageOfSurroundingCountry
    Indicates that a language is the primary or commonly used language in the country surrounding a given place or region.
  • D. languageOfSurroundingCulture
    Indicates that one entity is the language predominantly used or characteristic of the surrounding culture associated with another entity.
  • E. languageOfEvent
    Indicates the language in which an event is conducted, presented, or communicated.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f0ef878574819088c867fd1a5c8b86 completed April 28, 2026, 5:33 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fecd0a732c819097bdd3eb69b6158c completed May 9, 2026, 5:58 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fecc0318d481908b5b20598a76a9fe completed May 9, 2026, 5:54 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fecd091abc8190872974de731a80fa completed May 9, 2026, 5:58 a.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 8:48 p.m.