Triple
T29775562
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Proto-Barito language |
E755368
|
entity |
| Predicate | classificationProposedBy |
P102894
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Austronesian comparativists |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Austronesian comparativists | Statement: [Proto-Barito language, classificationProposedBy, Austronesian comparativists]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: classificationProposedBy Context triple: [Proto-Barito language, classificationProposedBy, Austronesian comparativists]
-
A.
classificationIntroduced
Indicates that one entity has introduced or established a particular classification or categorization for another entity.
-
B.
classificationConsensus
Indicates that multiple agents or sources agree on the same classification or category assignment for a given entity or item.
-
C.
classificationAccordingTo
Indicates that an entity is assigned a particular class, type, or category as defined or determined by a specified source, standard, or authority.
-
D.
hasProposedClassification
chosen
Indicates that an entity has suggested or put forward a particular classification for consideration or adoption.
-
E.
classificationUsedBy
Indicates that a particular classification system or scheme is employed or applied by a given entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f0ef878574819088c867fd1a5c8b86 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 5:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f68f670b608190a0b6ab60d722b4e0 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 11:57 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f68b7b03488190b1db5fde4c7dd6e5 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 11:40 p.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 8:46 p.m.