Triple
T29766991
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Contractors Hill |
E753940
|
entity |
| Predicate | isProminentAlong |
P144364
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Gaillard Cut |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Gaillard Cut | Statement: [Contractors Hill, isProminentAlong, Gaillard Cut]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isProminentAlong Context triple: [Contractors Hill, isProminentAlong, Gaillard Cut]
-
A.
hasProminence
Indicates that one entity stands out in importance, visibility, or influence relative to others within a given context.
-
B.
elevatedInProminenceBy
Indicates that an entity’s prominence, status, or visibility is increased as a result of the actions or influence of another entity.
-
C.
isOneOfMostProminentIn
Indicates that an entity ranks among the most notable, influential, or widely recognized members within a specified group, category, or domain.
-
D.
hasRelativeProminenceComparedTo
Indicates that one entity has a greater, lesser, or otherwise specified level of prominence or importance when compared to another entity.
-
E.
hasProminentLocation
chosen
Indicates that an entity occupies a highly visible, central, or otherwise notable position within a given space or context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f0ef827ff88190ade56e0b0846b713 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 5:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f676f968d08190a4adba0439b438c9 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 10:13 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f675ff62c48190a634bbb8896973b9 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 10:09 p.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 8:38 p.m.