Triple

T29734316
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Type IIA string theory E752413 entity
Predicate hasD0Branes P167820 FINISHED
Object yes LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Type IIA string theory, hasD0Branes, yes]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasD0Branes
Context triple: [Type IIA string theory, hasD0Branes, yes]
  • A. hasChiralFermions
    Indicates that the subject system or theory includes fermionic particles that exhibit chirality, meaning their left- and right-handed components transform differently under the relevant symmetry group.
  • B. hasBaryonNumber
    Indicates that an entity possesses a specific baryon number, quantifying its net content of baryonic matter (baryons minus antibaryons).
  • C. hasFermions
    Indicates that an entity possesses or is associated with one or more fermionic particles.
  • D. containsNonAbelianGaugeBosons
    Indicates that the entity includes gauge bosons associated with a non-Abelian (non-commutative) gauge symmetry group.
  • E. hasTopologicalExcitations
    Indicates that a system or structure exhibits excitations whose properties are determined by the system’s topology rather than local details.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f0d62a36a88190bf860f00da433ff8 completed April 28, 2026, 3:45 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6733385a081909bea1257ca0b490e completed May 2, 2026, 9:57 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f66ac1a4fc81909740d2e52fbe6970 completed May 2, 2026, 9:21 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f66c59de9881909ebbb7b0ae7ab495 completed May 2, 2026, 9:27 p.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 7:44 p.m.