Triple
T29722235
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | M. 83 |
E752087
|
entity |
| Predicate | workNumberingSchemeFor |
P70295
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Maurice Ravel |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Maurice Ravel | Statement: [M. 83, workNumberingSchemeFor, Maurice Ravel]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: workNumberingSchemeFor Context triple: [M. 83, workNumberingSchemeFor, Maurice Ravel]
-
A.
workNumbering
chosen
Indicates that a specific numbering or cataloging identifier is assigned to a work within a larger collection or system.
-
B.
workNumberingVariant
Indicates that one work serves as an alternative or variant numbering representation of another work within a numbering or cataloging system.
-
C.
associatedKeyWorkNumbering
Indicates that a key work is linked to, or identified by, a specific numbering system or reference number.
-
D.
standardNumberingScheme
Indicates that there is a specific, commonly accepted numbering system or convention being applied to identify or order the related entities.
-
E.
historicalNumberingScheme
Indicates that the associated numbering system or identifier reflects a past or legacy scheme that was used historically rather than the current one.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f0d628c00c8190ab5ee7e423d7ec3c |
completed | April 28, 2026, 3:45 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f674e06c9481909ed0ea736408f0d7 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 10:04 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f673c4abec8190bc2379e66f4af0a9 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 9:59 p.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 7:37 p.m.