Triple

T29721717
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject M. 55 E752070 entity
Predicate usedInRecordingsMetadata P192144 FINISHED
Object yes LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [M. 55, usedInRecordingsMetadata, yes]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usedInRecordingsMetadata
Context triple: [M. 55, usedInRecordingsMetadata, yes]
  • A. usedForRecordingBy
    Indicates that something serves as a medium, tool, or device that is employed by an agent to make a recording.
  • B. reRecordedWith
    Indicates that an existing recording was made again in collaboration with the specified entity (such as an artist, group, or producer).
  • C. reRecordedIn
    Indicates that an existing recording of something (e.g., a performance or audio/video content) was made again and captured in a new recording instance.
  • D. includesRecordingsBy
    Indicates that one entity (such as a collection, album, or compilation) contains or features recordings created or performed by another entity (such as an artist or group).
  • E. recordedFor
    Indicates that something has been documented, captured, or logged on behalf of or in association with a particular entity or context.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f0d628c00c8190ab5ee7e423d7ec3c completed April 28, 2026, 3:45 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fcf825ca7081909d06b0df33eb33f9 completed May 7, 2026, 8:37 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fcf42160f0819096812a8bf590875e completed May 7, 2026, 8:20 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fcf82405c88190a19cecf8e9cc272d completed May 7, 2026, 8:37 p.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 7:36 p.m.