Triple
T29721435
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | M.81 |
E752063
|
entity |
| Predicate | composerOfReferredWork |
P93691
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Maurice Ravel |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Maurice Ravel | Statement: [M.81, composerOfReferredWork, Maurice Ravel]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: composerOfReferredWork Context triple: [M.81, composerOfReferredWork, Maurice Ravel]
-
A.
composerOfRelatedWorks
Indicates that an entity is the composer of works that are related to another specified work or set of works.
-
B.
composerOfDepictingWork
Indicates that an entity is the composer of a musical work that is itself a depiction or representation of another entity or subject.
-
C.
composerOfMainWork
Indicates that one entity is the composer who created the primary or main work associated with another entity.
-
D.
composerOfSourceWork
chosen
Indicates that an entity is the composer who created the original source work on which another work is based.
-
E.
composerOfSongsInWork
Indicates that one entity is the composer of the songs contained within a particular work (such as a film, play, or album).
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f0d628c00c8190ab5ee7e423d7ec3c |
completed | April 28, 2026, 3:45 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f75dc25fa08190b371faf36d9fb72c |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:37 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f758586534819083e91172f4bf5098 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:14 p.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 7:36 p.m.