Triple
T2971930
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Patent Cooperation Treaty |
E80299
|
entity |
| Predicate | typeOfApplication |
P45312
|
FINISHED |
| Object | international patent application |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: international patent application | Statement: [Patent Cooperation Treaty, typeOfApplication, international patent application]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typeOfApplication Context triple: [Patent Cooperation Treaty, typeOfApplication, international patent application]
-
A.
typeOfProject
Indicates the specific category or kind of project that an entity is associated with or classified under.
-
B.
packageType
Indicates the classification or category of packaging associated with an item or shipment.
-
C.
typeOfWork
Indicates the kind or category of work associated with or performed by an entity.
-
D.
applicantType
Indicates the classification or category of an applicant in relation to an application or selection process.
-
E.
typeOfIntegration
Indicates the specific kind or category of integration that exists or is applied between systems, components, or processes.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad8b14ffe881908ffed62f9595c867 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:43 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ad998656948190ba79d7196d735f34 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 3:45 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ad960e71f8819088179d11248c6ed0 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 3:30 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69ad98379fac8190a4dfe530787703c9 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 3:39 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 2:58 p.m.