Triple
T2971713
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Vice President’s National Energy Policy Development Group |
E80294
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalCase |
P3996
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Sierra Club v. Cheney |
E16775
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Sierra Club v. Cheney | Statement: [Vice President’s National Energy Policy Development Group, legalCase, Sierra Club v. Cheney]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Sierra Club v. Cheney Context triple: [Vice President’s National Energy Policy Development Group, legalCase, Sierra Club v. Cheney]
-
A.
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC is a 1978 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited courts’ ability to impose additional procedural requirements on federal agencies beyond those mandated by the Administrative Procedure Act and relevant statutes.
-
B.
Cheney v. U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
chosen
Cheney v. U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia is a 2004 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court limited judicial intrusion into the executive branch’s internal deliberations, particularly regarding Vice President Dick Cheney’s energy task force records.
-
C.
Arizona v. United States
Arizona v. United States is a 2012 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited state authority over immigration enforcement by affirming broad federal power in this area.
-
D.
Gonzales v. Raich
Gonzales v. Raich is a 2005 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld federal power to prohibit local cultivation and use of marijuana under the Commerce Clause, even when states permit it for medical purposes.
-
E.
Chiafalo v. Washington
Chiafalo v. Washington is a 2020 U.S. Supreme Court case that unanimously upheld states’ authority to penalize or replace “faithless electors” who do not vote in line with their state’s popular vote in presidential elections.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad8b14ffe881908ffed62f9595c867 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:43 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ad9973ed6881908f11f49ca2e171df |
completed | March 8, 2026, 3:44 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69b0fca910e481909c1d93b512a779aa |
completed | March 11, 2026, 5:24 a.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 2:58 p.m.