Triple
T29715720
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Westwick |
E751901
|
entity |
| Predicate | administrativelyLinkedWith |
P37165
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Oakington |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Oakington | Statement: [Westwick, administrativelyLinkedWith, Oakington]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: administrativelyLinkedWith Context triple: [Westwick, administrativelyLinkedWith, Oakington]
-
A.
modernIdentityLinkedTo
Indicates that an entity’s current or contemporary identity is associated with, derived from, or connected to another entity.
-
B.
associatedWithAdministration
chosen
Indicates a relationship in which an entity is connected to, involved in, or under the responsibility of an administrative body, process, or function.
-
C.
associatedThrough
Indicates that two entities are connected or related to each other by means of a specified intermediary, context, or linkage.
-
D.
associatedFort
Indicates that one entity is connected or linked to a particular fort, typically as its related or corresponding fortification.
-
E.
relatedIdentity
Indicates that two identities are connected or associated with each other in some meaningful way, such as being alternate, linked, or otherwise contextually related.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f0d62748848190b030d0a703629a7d |
completed | April 28, 2026, 3:45 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fb2e940d5c8190bceae77daf4ef512 |
completed | May 6, 2026, 12:05 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f9fec70bd881909c658a3c5020318b |
completed | May 5, 2026, 2:29 p.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 7:33 p.m.