Triple
T29697149
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Finnish municipalities |
E751381
|
entity |
| Predicate | mayMergeInto |
P60771
|
FINISHED |
| Object | larger municipality |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: larger municipality | Statement: [Finnish municipalities, mayMergeInto, larger municipality]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: mayMergeInto Context triple: [Finnish municipalities, mayMergeInto, larger municipality]
-
A.
canMerge
chosen
Indicates that two or more entities are compatible in such a way that they can be combined into a single unified entity or structure.
-
B.
mergedInto
Indicates that one entity has been combined with and absorbed into another entity, ceasing to exist as a separate unit.
-
C.
intendedToMerge
Indicates that one entity had the purpose or plan to combine or consolidate with another entity into a single unit.
-
D.
mayExtendTo
Indicates that something has the potential or permission to reach, continue, or be applied up to a specified limit, scope, or boundary.
-
E.
mergedBy
Indicates that one entity is combined or integrated into another entity through the action or decision of a specific agent.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f0d6266f8481909e70bb41cda18587 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 3:45 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f672b1186081909861338709be96d8 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 9:54 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6659f246081909821c5f452d14e8f |
completed | May 2, 2026, 8:59 p.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 7:21 p.m.