Triple

T29694116
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Type I string theory E751295 entity
Predicate isConsistentQuantumGravityTheory P141077 FINISHED
Object yes LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Type I string theory, isConsistentQuantumGravityTheory, yes]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isConsistentQuantumGravityTheory
Context triple: [Type I string theory, isConsistentQuantumGravityTheory, yes]
  • A. generalRelativityConsistent
    Indicates that the described theory, model, or scenario does not conflict with and adheres to the principles and predictions of general relativity.
  • B. isPerturbativelyConsistent chosen
    Indicates that a theory, model, or approximation remains mathematically well-defined and free of inconsistencies order by order in perturbation theory.
  • C. isQuantumOf
    Indicates that one entity represents a discrete, indivisible unit or packet of the other entity in a quantized relationship.
  • D. roleInQuantumGravity
    Indicates that an entity has a specific function, status, or contribution within the theoretical framework or research program of quantum gravity.
  • E. reducesToGeneralRelativityWhen
    Indicates that a theory, model, or equation reproduces the predictions and form of general relativity under specified limiting conditions.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f0d625b09481909b0b69aea1e846c8 completed April 28, 2026, 3:45 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6c1265c208190aacd2b551f8f0f82 completed May 3, 2026, 3:29 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6bd2415fc81908c23c311aebce66f completed May 3, 2026, 3:12 a.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 7:19 p.m.