Triple
T29691089
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | icewmtray |
E751209
|
entity |
| Predicate | statusIconProtocol |
P193943
|
FINISHED |
| Object | XEmbed-based system tray protocol |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: XEmbed-based system tray protocol | Statement: [icewmtray, statusIconProtocol, XEmbed-based system tray protocol]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: statusIconProtocol Context triple: [icewmtray, statusIconProtocol, XEmbed-based system tray protocol]
-
A.
statusInterface
Indicates that an entity serves as, or is associated with, an interface that reports or reflects its current status.
-
B.
statusSymbol
Indicates that something serves as a marker or representation of an entity’s social, economic, or cultural standing relative to others.
-
C.
statusModel
Indicates that an entity is associated with a particular status representation or status-handling model.
-
D.
statusInSI
Indicates that an entity’s status or condition is specified according to the International System of Units (SI) or an SI-based standard.
-
E.
statusIndicates
Indicates that a particular status value conveys or reflects the current condition, state, or situation of an entity or process.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f0d625b09481909b0b69aea1e846c8 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 3:45 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fd5bf69acc819092a01e4259785dc3 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 3:43 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fd59b3f4ac8190a7f9dd3142da6e09 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 3:34 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69fd5bf49288819098a12202411cba4f |
completed | May 8, 2026, 3:43 a.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 7:16 p.m.