Triple
T29690722
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Breeze window decoration |
E751202
|
entity |
| Predicate | colorSchemeIntegration |
P62473
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Breeze color schemes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Breeze color schemes | Statement: [Breeze window decoration, colorSchemeIntegration, Breeze color schemes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: colorSchemeIntegration Context triple: [Breeze window decoration, colorSchemeIntegration, Breeze color schemes]
-
A.
hasColourScheme
Indicates that an entity is associated with a particular set or pattern of colors used in its design or appearance.
-
B.
colorSystem
chosen
Indicates that one entity is a system or scheme used to define, organize, or represent the colors of another entity.
-
C.
formerColorScheme
Indicates that an entity previously used a particular color scheme but no longer does so.
-
D.
colorUse
Indicates that one entity uses, applies, or is associated with a particular color in its appearance, design, or representation.
-
E.
colorSelection
Indicates the relationship in which an entity chooses or is assigned a specific color from a set of possible colors.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f0d625b09481909b0b69aea1e846c8 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 3:45 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6d0d46aec819091edf97324d793ac |
completed | May 3, 2026, 4:36 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6cfe2183481908ae4e85a59c66f69 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 4:32 a.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 7:16 p.m.