Triple

T29682565
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Bullis E750994 entity
Predicate relatedToModelGeneration P97305 FINISHED
Object Volkswagen Type 2 T1 NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Volkswagen Type 2 T1 | Statement: [Bullis, relatedToModelGeneration, Volkswagen Type 2 T1]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relatedToModelGeneration
Context triple: [Bullis, relatedToModelGeneration, Volkswagen Type 2 T1]
  • A. associatedModelGeneration
    Indicates that one entity is responsible for creating, producing, or generating another related model or representation.
  • B. secondGenerationRelatedModel
    Indicates that one model is derived from or based on another model that is itself already a derived (first-generation) model, forming a second-generation relationship.
  • C. belongsToGeneration
    Indicates that an entity is associated with, classified within, or a member of a particular generation or generational group.
  • D. associatedWithModel chosen
    Indicates that one entity has a defined connection, linkage, or relationship with a particular model.
  • E. relatedTo
    Indicates a general, non-specific relationship or association exists between two entities.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f0d624d7b08190ba237d226f78d0d9 completed April 28, 2026, 3:45 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_6a0191d96dc88190ac0823e534f9d704 completed May 11, 2026, 8:22 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_6a01908110448190a46442ffe4d15f5f completed May 11, 2026, 8:17 a.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 7:11 p.m.