Triple
T29649689
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Japan vs Poland (2018 FIFA World Cup) |
E756100
|
entity |
| Predicate | fairPlayAdvantageOver |
P635
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Senegal national football team |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Senegal national football team | Statement: [Japan vs Poland (2018 FIFA World Cup), fairPlayAdvantageOver, Senegal national football team]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: fairPlayAdvantageOver Context triple: [Japan vs Poland (2018 FIFA World Cup), fairPlayAdvantageOver, Senegal national football team]
-
A.
fairPlayAspect
Indicates that the relationship or action pertains to an aspect or dimension of fair play, such as fairness, sportsmanship, or equitable conduct within a rule-governed context.
-
B.
fairPlayAwardTeam
Indicates that a team has been recognized with a fair play award for exemplary sportsmanship or ethical conduct in competition.
-
C.
hasAdvantage
chosen
Indicates that one entity possesses a benefit, edge, or favorable position over another in a given context.
-
D.
aidedOpponent
Indicates that one entity provided help or support to another entity who is considered an opponent or adversary.
-
E.
playedUnderRulesOf
Indicates that an activity or game was conducted in accordance with a specified set of rules or regulations.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f0ef89d2c88190a6d0d5116ccd7cc9 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 5:34 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f66f2329b08190b0ce42740644ecf6 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 9:39 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6659d36208190b01412600a4ed57d |
completed | May 2, 2026, 8:59 p.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 6:51 p.m.