Triple
T29636165
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | VQ-VAE |
E755720
|
entity |
| Predicate | usesTrick |
P71441
|
FINISHED |
| Object | straight-through estimator |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: straight-through estimator | Statement: [VQ-VAE, usesTrick, straight-through estimator]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usesTrick Context triple: [VQ-VAE, usesTrick, straight-through estimator]
-
A.
tricked
Indicates that one entity intentionally deceived another into believing something false or acting under a false impression.
-
B.
usesDeceptionTo
Indicates that one entity employs deceit or misleading tactics in order to influence, manipulate, or achieve an outcome involving another entity.
-
C.
hasTrickType
Indicates that an entity (such as a trick or maneuver) is associated with a specific type or category of trick.
-
D.
gimmick
chosen
Indicates that an entity uses or features a novel, attention-grabbing trick or device primarily intended to attract interest rather than provide substantive value.
-
E.
performedTrick
Indicates that one entity executed or carried out a trick involving another entity or in a particular context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f0ef88fbe081908f0ad90c1c413f1c |
completed | April 28, 2026, 5:34 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f7117e55908190a67105e92bc4830f |
completed | May 3, 2026, 9:12 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f70f380690819090cc34763ba460ed |
completed | May 3, 2026, 9:02 a.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 6:44 p.m.