Triple
T29628762
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Nights |
E755515
|
entity |
| Predicate | criticalNote |
P147096
|
FINISHED |
| Object | often cited as a standout track on Blonde |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: often cited as a standout track on Blonde | Statement: [Nights, criticalNote, often cited as a standout track on Blonde]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: criticalNote Context triple: [Nights, criticalNote, often cited as a standout track on Blonde]
-
A.
criticalDescription
chosen
Indicates that one entity provides an evaluative or analytical description of another entity, often highlighting strengths, weaknesses, or significance.
-
B.
criticalTo
Indicates that one entity is essential or indispensable for the functioning, success, or existence of another entity.
-
C.
criticalInterpretation
Indicates that one entity offers an evaluative, analytical, or interpretive commentary on another (such as a text, work, or idea).
-
D.
importantNote
Indicates that one entity is marked as an important or noteworthy note in relation to another entity.
-
E.
criticalReevaluation
Indicates a thorough, often skeptical reassessment of something’s validity, quality, or conclusions in light of new evidence, perspectives, or standards.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f0ef88fbe081908f0ad90c1c413f1c |
completed | April 28, 2026, 5:34 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f66e6281208190879666caba618a23 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 9:36 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6659d36208190b01412600a4ed57d |
completed | May 2, 2026, 8:59 p.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 6:39 p.m.