Triple
T29620215
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Malawi–Tanzania border |
E754972
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasLegalPrincipleInvoked |
P187043
|
FINISHED |
| Object | uti possidetis juris |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: uti possidetis juris | Statement: [Malawi–Tanzania border, hasLegalPrincipleInvoked, uti possidetis juris]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasLegalPrincipleInvoked Context triple: [Malawi–Tanzania border, hasLegalPrincipleInvoked, uti possidetis juris]
-
A.
hasLegalRelevanceIn
Indicates that something is legally significant, applicable, or has consequences within a specified legal context, case, or jurisdiction.
-
B.
hasCriminalLawPrinciple
Indicates that there exists a criminal law doctrine, rule, or principle that applies to, governs, or characterizes the referenced entity or situation.
-
C.
legalBasisConsidered
Indicates that a decision, action, or assessment has taken into account the relevant legal grounds, statutes, or regulations as part of its justification.
-
D.
hasLegalFunction
Indicates that an entity performs, fulfills, or is assigned a specific legal role, duty, or function within a legal or regulatory context.
-
E.
hasLegalForceIn
Indicates that something (such as a law, regulation, or agreement) is legally valid, binding, and enforceable within a specified jurisdiction or context.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f0ef86b6ec8190a87fff07fd983b1e |
completed | April 28, 2026, 5:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fb3425666081908916fcbf3b5dd907 |
completed | May 6, 2026, 12:29 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fb2f5f3164819099429c2cc3d24e01 |
completed | May 6, 2026, 12:09 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69fb3424724c8190ba55ecf66fa0b171 |
completed | May 6, 2026, 12:29 p.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 6:34 p.m.