Triple

T29586427
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Book I: General Norms E754034 entity
Predicate beginsWithCanon P167482 FINISHED
Object canon 1 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: canon 1 | Statement: [Book I: General Norms, beginsWithCanon, canon 1]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: beginsWithCanon
Context triple: [Book I: General Norms, beginsWithCanon, canon 1]
  • A. inCanonWith
    Indicates that two or more works, events, or elements are officially recognized as belonging to the same narrative continuity or canon.
  • B. usesCanon
    Indicates that one entity employs or relies on another entity as its standard, reference, or authoritative source.
  • C. beganWith
    Indicates that one event, process, or state started with or was initiated by another specified event, process, or state.
  • D. inCanonOf
    Indicates that one entity is officially recognized as part of the established canon or authoritative body of works associated with another entity.
  • E. givesCanon
    Indicates that one entity provides or establishes an official or authoritative version (canon) of something for another entity or context.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f0ef836ac88190bd809dc58b5ec907 completed April 28, 2026, 5:33 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f66d7dfb948190b35070cef785d6b8 completed May 2, 2026, 9:32 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6659d36208190b01412600a4ed57d completed May 2, 2026, 8:59 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f6691da93081909deaf680614fc900 completed May 2, 2026, 9:14 p.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 6:11 p.m.