Triple

T29586426
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Book I: General Norms E754034 entity
Predicate hasCanonicalRange P27293 FINISHED
Object canons 1–203 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: canons 1–203 | Statement: [Book I: General Norms, hasCanonicalRange, canons 1–203]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasCanonicalRange
Context triple: [Book I: General Norms, hasCanonicalRange, canons 1–203]
  • A. hasRange chosen
    Indicates that a property or relation is constrained to take its values from a specified class, type, or value set.
  • B. hasCanonicalLength
    Indicates that something possesses a standard or officially defined length used as a reference or norm.
  • C. hasCanonicalRepresentation
    Indicates that one entity is the standard or authoritative form in which another entity is represented.
  • D. hasCanonicalNumber
    Indicates that an entity is associated with its officially recognized or standard reference number.
  • E. hasCanonicalContinuity
    Indicates that one entity’s storyline, version, or depiction is officially recognized as part of the primary, authoritative continuity of another entity or universe.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f0ef836ac88190bd809dc58b5ec907 completed April 28, 2026, 5:33 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fd6dbd1b648190b1a0b391c03aebc5 completed May 8, 2026, 4:59 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fd6a9020548190bbfa845360ac85fb completed May 8, 2026, 4:46 a.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 6:11 p.m.