Triple
T29583915
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Reer Xamar |
E753669
|
entity |
| Predicate | ethnoregionalIdentity |
P156628
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Benadiri |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Benadiri | Statement: [Reer Xamar, ethnoregionalIdentity, Benadiri]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: ethnoregionalIdentity Context triple: [Reer Xamar, ethnoregionalIdentity, Benadiri]
-
A.
ethnoreligiousIdentity
Indicates a relationship where an entity is characterized by a combined ethnic and religious group identity.
-
B.
ethnicIdentityOf
chosen
Indicates that one entity is the ethnic identity or affiliation possessed by another entity.
-
C.
ethnicRegionOfFocus
Indicates that a particular ethnic group or ethnicity is the primary regional focus or subject of attention in a given context.
-
D.
ethnoLinguisticRegionOf
Indicates that a region is defined or characterized by the shared ethnic and linguistic identity of the group associated with it.
-
E.
ethnolinguisticGroups
Indicates a relationship where groups are categorized or associated based on shared ethnic and linguistic characteristics.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f0ef80bf8c8190ad286e99f7df0c63 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 5:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f66d7c7c80819085dc7eae20560af6 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 9:32 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6659d36208190b01412600a4ed57d |
completed | May 2, 2026, 8:59 p.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 6:09 p.m.