Triple
T29582100
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Jack Torrance about the hotel’s history |
E753615
|
entity |
| Predicate | warnsAboutAction |
P168156
|
FINISHED |
| Object | caretakerKilledFamily |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: caretakerKilledFamily | Statement: [Jack Torrance about the hotel’s history, warnsAboutAction, caretakerKilledFamily]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: warnsAboutAction Context triple: [Jack Torrance about the hotel’s history, warnsAboutAction, caretakerKilledFamily]
-
A.
warnsAbout
Indicates that one entity alerts or cautions another entity about a potential danger, risk, or problem.
-
B.
warningIssued
Indicates that a formal warning or alert has been communicated from one entity to another regarding a potential or existing risk, problem, or violation.
-
C.
warningGivenBy
Indicates that one entity issues or delivers a warning to another entity.
-
D.
warningFunction
Indicates a function or mechanism that issues a warning in response to certain conditions or inputs.
-
E.
warnedAgainstIn
Indicates that one entity cautioned or advised another entity not to engage with or participate in something within a particular context or situation.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f0ef80bf8c8190ad286e99f7df0c63 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 5:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f673633d288190b52ceb9f8a057c44 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 9:57 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f66ec5bf508190ad088b89455252bd |
completed | May 2, 2026, 9:38 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f67256d064819094be04fc1bbbc635 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 9:53 p.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 6:07 p.m.