Triple
T29572893
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Face of Baal |
E753356
|
entity |
| Predicate | divinePair |
P117165
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Baal and Tanit |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Baal and Tanit | Statement: [Face of Baal, divinePair, Baal and Tanit]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: divinePair Context triple: [Face of Baal, divinePair, Baal and Tanit]
-
A.
pairedDeityFunction
chosen
Indicates a relationship where two deities jointly share, complement, or cooperate in performing a specific divine role, duty, or function.
-
B.
divineSign
Indicates that one entity serves as a supernatural or sacred omen, message, or signal from a divine source to another entity.
-
C.
divineAgent
Indicates that the related entity acts as a deity or supernatural agent responsible for causing or overseeing the associated event or state.
-
D.
dualPair
Indicates that two entities form a dual pair, standing in a mathematically defined dual relationship where each is the dual counterpart of the other.
-
E.
divineLineage
Indicates that one entity is descended from, or originates from, a divine or god-like being.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f0ef7fcb4881908a933110adb9bda1 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 5:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f66d4896648190b8f42af1996b9bc3 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 9:31 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6659d36208190b01412600a4ed57d |
completed | May 2, 2026, 8:59 p.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 6 p.m.