Triple
T2957210
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ute language |
E79960
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Numic language |
C13863
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: Numic language Context triple: [Ute language, instanceOf, Numic language]
-
A.
Zenati language
The Zenati language is a conceptual class representing a branch of Berber languages characterized by shared phonological, morphological, and lexical features that distinguish it from other Afroasiatic language groups.
-
B.
Munda language
The Munda language is a member of the Austroasiatic language family spoken primarily by indigenous Munda communities in eastern and central India, characterized by agglutinative morphology and distinct phonological features.
-
C.
Central Tano language
A Central Tano language is a member of the Tano branch of the Niger-Congo language family spoken primarily in Ghana and neighboring regions, characterized by tonal phonology and shared grammatical and lexical features with related Akanic and Guang languages.
-
D.
Caddoan language
A Caddoan language is any member of a small family of Indigenous languages of the central United States, historically spoken by Caddo, Wichita, Pawnee, and related peoples, characterized by complex verb morphology and now mostly endangered or extinct.
-
E.
Chibchan language
A Chibchan language is a member of a family of indigenous languages spoken primarily in Central America and northern South America, characterized by shared grammatical and phonological features reflecting a common ancestral origin.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad8b1276588190a374a0b12e0f7bdf |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:43 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 2:57 p.m.