Triple

T29558849
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject 16 Vayathinile E749979 entity
Predicate antagonistMilestoneFor P18963 FINISHED
Object Rajinikanth NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Rajinikanth | Statement: [16 Vayathinile, antagonistMilestoneFor, Rajinikanth]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: antagonistMilestoneFor
Context triple: [16 Vayathinile, antagonistMilestoneFor, Rajinikanth]
  • A. antagonistOf chosen
    Indicates a relationship where one entity actively opposes, conflicts with, or serves as an adversary to another.
  • B. antagonistActionOf
    Indicates that one entity performs an action in opposition or hostility toward another entity, acting as its antagonist.
  • C. antagonistStatus
    Indicates that an entity holds an opposing or adversarial role, often acting as the main source of conflict relative to another entity or objective.
  • D. hasAntagonisticProtagonist
    Indicates that the work features a main character who opposes or undermines the typical heroic or moral expectations of a traditional protagonist.
  • E. antagonistMethod
    Indicates the method or strategy an antagonist uses to oppose, harm, or create conflict with another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f0bd4919e48190942b2a13d5b97d03 completed April 28, 2026, 1:59 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f674e06c9481909ed0ea736408f0d7 completed May 2, 2026, 10:04 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f673c4abec8190bc2379e66f4af0a9 completed May 2, 2026, 9:59 p.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 5:18 p.m.