Triple
T29546963
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Malaysian law |
E749655
|
entity |
| Predicate | contractLawInfluencedBy |
P24435
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Indian Contract Act 1872 |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Indian Contract Act 1872 | Statement: [Malaysian law, contractLawInfluencedBy, Indian Contract Act 1872]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: contractLawInfluencedBy Context triple: [Malaysian law, contractLawInfluencedBy, Indian Contract Act 1872]
-
A.
legalDoctrineInfluenced
Indicates that one legal doctrine has shaped, informed, or contributed to the development or interpretation of another legal doctrine.
-
B.
hasCommonLegalInfluence
Indicates that two or more entities are subject to, shaped by, or governed under the same legal authority, framework, or precedent.
-
C.
impactOnLaw
Indicates the effect or influence that one entity, event, or action has on laws, legal rules, or the legal system.
-
D.
legalTraditionInfluenced
chosen
Indicates that one legal tradition has had a formative or shaping influence on the development, principles, or practices of another legal tradition.
-
E.
legalContext
Indicates that the relationship or action occurs within, is shaped by, or is relevant to a specific legal framework, proceeding, or set of legal norms.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f0bd48691081908cecad39bac591e0 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 1:59 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fd05ba6b2c81909c62b46237d10365 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 9:35 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fd03039e48819082b6e12c5453885a |
completed | May 7, 2026, 9:24 p.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 5:08 p.m.